Why is the Relkeel Hurdle so-called?

Why is the Relkeel Hurdle so-called?  For the uninitiated, the Relkeel Hurdle is, nowadays, a Grade 2 contest, run over 2 miles, 4 furlongs and 56 yards on the New Course at Cheltenham on New Year’s Day. The race was inaugurated, as the Mercury Communications Hurdle, in 1988, although at that stage it was contested during the International Meeting (now the Christmas Meeting) at Cheltenham in early December. The following year, the race was won by Morley Street, who went on to finish fifth behind Kribensis in the Champion Hurdle less than three months later and justified favouritism in the two-mile hurdling championship in 1991.

In 1992, Lonesome Glory, trained by Bruce Miller and ridden by his daughter, Blythe, sprang a 20/1 surprise when running down the odds-on favourite, Al Mutahm, close home to become the first American-trained horse to win a National Hunt race in Britain. Thus, the following year, the race was renamed in honour of that history-making winner, but was renamed, again, to its current title in 2000. The Relkeel Hurdle was promoted to Grade 2 status in 2006.

The titular Relkeel was a three-time winner of what is now the International Hurdle, back in the day when it was still known as the Bula Hurdle, in honour of the dual Champion Hurdle winner, trained by Fred Winter. Prior to 1977, the race was known as the Cheltenham Trial Hurdle and was won by Bula en route to his second victory in the Champion Hurdle. Relkeel recorded back-to-back victories in the Bula Hurdle in 1997 and 1998, when trained by the late David Nicholson and ridden by Richard Johnson, on the first occasion, and Adrian Maguire, on the second.

Nicholson retired from the training ranks in November 1999 and, following his transfer to Alan King, almost a year to the day, returned to Cheltenham, as a 10-year-old, for an emotional, albeit narrow, third victory in the race. Conceding 4lb and upwards all ’round, Relkeel was sent off 13/2 fourth choice of the seven runners, ahead of 6/4 favourite Katarino, but, with the market leader managing only a remote fifth, beaten 17 lengths, the Relkino gelding was left to fight out the finish with 100/30 second favourite, and Doncaster Cup winner, Far Cry, trained by Martin Pipe. Ridden by A.P. McCoy, Far Cry took a narrow lead approaching the final flight, but was headed soon afterwards and, after a ding-dong battle on the run-in, it was Relkeel that prevailed, by a neck, with 11 lengths back to the third horse home, Shooting Light.

All told, Relkeel won 12 of his 21 starts under National Hunt Rules, including the Champion Hurdle Trial at Haydock Park, in which he beat the reigning Champion Hurdler, Flakey Dove, by 8 lengths, conceding 5lb. Nine of those victories came under Adrian Maguire and Relkeel amassed a total of £142,309. His record was all the more remarkable for the fact that, in an injury-plagued career he was, at various points, absent for 238, 748, 309 and 364 days.

Relkeel finished his racing career on a low-key note, when only fifth of six, beaten 17 lengths, in the Rendelsham Hurdle at Kempton Park in February 2000. Thereafter, he spent his retirement with Mark White, former head groom to Nicholson, who had been his one and only rider at the yard. White later described his third victory in the Bula Hurdle as ‘sheer ecstasy’. Relkeel was put down in April 2006, as a 17-year-old, due to the effects of arthritis, at which point Nicholson heaped praise on his former charge. He said, ‘Ability-wise he was better than any other horse I ever trained. On his day he was brilliant, and had he not suffered the problems that affected his career he would have won the Champion Hurdle, there’s no doubt about that.’

Why was the 1880 Derby winner, Bend Or, subject to an objection?

Why was the 1880 Derby winner, Bend Or, subject to an objection?  The history books still record that, on May 26, 1880, the unbeaten 2/1 favourite Bend Or, ridden by Fred Archer, edged out Robert The Devil, ridden by Edward Rossiter, to win the Derby by a head. However, shortly afterwards, a rumour began to circulate that Bend Or was not, in fact, Bend Or, but another three-year-old chestnut colt, named Tadcaster. Like Bend Or, Tadcaster was homebred by Hugh Grosvenor, First Duke of Westminster, at his Eaton Stud in Cheshire and, like Bend Or, was sired by the 1873 Derby winner Doncaster, but out of a different dam.

According to Richard Arnull, a soon-to-be-former stud groom at Eaton Stud, the two colts had been inadvertently switched as foals. His motivation for revealing that information, after the fact, remains unclear, but the rumour resulted in the joint-owners of Robert The Devil, Charles Brewer and Charles Blanton, who also trained the horse, lodging a belated objection against ‘Bend Or’ on the grounds that he was ‘not the horse he was represented to be’. In the absence of irrevocable evidence, one way or the other, the Epsom stewards faced a nigh on impossible task to resolve the matter and, based on what was effectively hearsay, unanimously overruled the objection, such that the result was allowed to stand.

Fast forward 130 years or so and, in 2012, evidence came to light that suggested, whatever his original intentions, Richard Arnull was right. A research project compared mitochondrial DNA taken from the skeleton of Bend Or with that taken from the living relatives of Tadcaster and proved, beyond reasonable doubt, that the 1880 Derby winner could not have been out of Rouge Rose, believed to be the dam of Bend Or, but proved a perfect match for Clemence, the dam of Tadcaster. A fascinating chapter in racing, of course the gambling world has changed significantly since then with wolfwinner online pokies for real money and the like, though racing is as popular as ever!

What is NRNB in Horse Racing?

If you are the kind of racing punter who likes to tackle the ante-post markets, you’ll likely have come across the term NRNB. It stands for Non-Runner No Bet, meaning that you will have your stake returned if, for some reason, your selection does not participate in the race.

NRNB is, therefore, an easy concept to understand, yet that said, its importance to some bettors cannot be understated. Moreover, it gets a bit more complicated as part of horse racing betting strategies.

To explain, you should consider the following scenario: If you place a bet, say, a couple of hours before a race, and your selection is suddenly scratched from the race, it’s almost certain that NRNB will be applied automatically. You’ll get your money back by presenting your betting slip (if you’re at the track) or automatically refunded to your online betting account.

Now, what if the bet wasn’t placed a couple of hours before the race but several months before it? Perhaps surprisingly for some inexperienced bettors, it’s actually highly unlikely that you would get your money back. That might sound unfair, but we can elaborate on the reasons why.

NRNB & Ante-Post Betting Strategies

It’s important to understand NRNB within the context of ante-post betting. If you were to look at the 2026 Grand National odds today, it’s clear that the markets will look very different nine months from now when the race goes off. There is a summer and the best part of the national hunt season to get through before we reach Mid-April at the Grand National at Aintree.

The allure of finding value

Therefore, you might see a horse available at 100/1 in the Grand National markets today who ends up being 10/1 on race day after impressing across the jumps season. That’s the art of ante-post betting: you are betting on the potential. It is an attempt to outsmart the bookmakers.

Now, the flipside is that your selection might not end up running in the race. If NRNB is not offered (which is unlikely at this point in our Grand National example), then you wouldn’t get your money back. The argument, on the bookmakers’ behalf, is that you are benefitting from potentially inflated odds and thus your wager is twofold: first, you are betting on the horse winning the race. Secondly, you are betting on the horse participating in the race.

For balance, we should say that there can be instances where you pick a horse in the ante-post markets and its odds actually rise before the race goes off, meaning you took a price that was lower than the SP. This does happen, but it’s again part of the ups and downs of ante-post betting.

A balance between risk and reward

So, why bother at all with ante-post betting? Why not just wait until closer to the race, knowing you will get your stake back if the horse doesn’t run? Well, as hinted, it’s all part of the art of ante-post betting. You are, in a sense, hunting for value. We can give some real-world examples. In January 2021, Put the Kettle On was priced around 66/1 for the Queen Mother Champion Chase that upcoming March at the Cheltenham Festival. By the time the Festival rolled around two months later, the mare was priced with an SP of 17/2. She duly won the race, and those who took the risk in January were handsomely rewarded.

It doesn’t always work out as neatly as it did with Put the Kettle On, but it is an example of what ante-post bettors are trying to achieve. They get double satisfaction – knowing that they won the race and that they got a much better price by employing a long-term strategy.

We will finish with an important tip. If you have an eye on a particular festival, shop around different bookmakers, as many will offer NRNB on big races as part of a promotion. It could give you an extra piece of insurance as part of your racing strategy.

Why did Sheikh Adbdullah Almalek Alsabah remove his horses from George Boughey?

Why did Sheikh Adbdullah Almalek Alsabah remove his horses from George Boughey?  For readers unfamiliar with the name, Sheikh Adbdullah Almalek Alsabah is a former champion owner in his native Kuwait, where he is a member of the ruling family, and has invested increasingly heavily in British bloodstock over the last decade or so. He has, or has had, horses in training with numerous trainers throughout the country, including David O’Meara, Richard Fahey, Kevin Philippart De Foy, Richard Hannon and, until recently, George Boughey. Boughey, on the other hand, is a Classic winning trainer based at Saffron House Stables in Newmarket. He set up on his own, at the age of 27, in 2019, having spent six years as assistant trainer to Hugo Palmer at nearby Kremlin Cottage Stables and, with already over 300 winners to his name, is considered one of the rising stars of the sport.

On June 28, 2023, four days after Royal Ascot, it was reported that Sheikh Adbdullah had removed all his horses from Saffron House Stables, citing a breakdown in communication between himself and Boughey before, and during, the Royal meeting. He told the ‘Racing Post’, ‘I spend millions of pounds on horses every year and if I lose, I’m not angry or upset, but it’s very important there is openness between the owner and trainer.’

His principle cause for complaint was the participation of his promising two-year-old Asadna, who was sent off 7/2 favourite for the Group 2 Coventry Stakes, but could finish only ninth, beaten six lengths by the winner, River Tiber. Asadna suffered a cut to his shoulder on the previous Friday morning but, according to Boughey, ‘…did not miss a day of work and was at no point lame.’ Sheikh Abdullah, though, was insistent that he ‘told him [Boughey] not to run [Asadna].’ His frustration was compounded when his intended runners in the Palace of Holyrood Stakes and the Commonwealth Cup, Dark Alert and Al Dasim, were withdrawn, late in the day, on veterinary advice.

1 2 3 4 5 6 153